<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.3.2" -->
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: State of OpenID - April 2007: By the numbers</title>
	<link>http://kveton.com/blog/2007/04/02/state-of-openid-april-2007-by-the-numbers/</link>
	<description>Husband, father, geek, pizza maker &#38; bacon lover</description>
	<pubDate>Sun, 23 Nov 2008 15:37:58 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.3.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Oxa Koba</title>
		<link>http://kveton.com/blog/2007/04/02/state-of-openid-april-2007-by-the-numbers/#comment-39359</link>
		<dc:creator>Oxa Koba</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Aug 2007 20:53:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://kveton.com/blog/2007/04/02/state-of-openid-april-2007-by-the-numbers/#comment-39359</guid>
		<description>Regarding "Integrated Social Networking":

The community at Microformats.org have taken up the issue of Social Network Portabilty ( http://microformats.org/wiki/social-network-portability ).

Because OpenID is involved in the conversation (and rightly so), I hope that you can encourage people from the OpenID community to get involved.

Particularly of note, I think someone more technically savy may need to clarify the role of persona's in the interchange of data during the OpenID process.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Regarding &#8220;Integrated Social Networking&#8221;:</p>
<p>The community at Microformats.org have taken up the issue of Social Network Portabilty ( <a href="http://microformats.org/wiki/social-network-portability" rel="nofollow">http://microformats.org/wiki/social-network-portability</a> ).</p>
<p>Because OpenID is involved in the conversation (and rightly so), I hope that you can encourage people from the OpenID community to get involved.</p>
<p>Particularly of note, I think someone more technically savy may need to clarify the role of persona&#8217;s in the interchange of data during the OpenID process.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ryan</title>
		<link>http://kveton.com/blog/2007/04/02/state-of-openid-april-2007-by-the-numbers/#comment-18795</link>
		<dc:creator>Ryan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Apr 2007 17:37:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://kveton.com/blog/2007/04/02/state-of-openid-april-2007-by-the-numbers/#comment-18795</guid>
		<description>I believe OpenID's flaw isn't technological, it's mental. We need to get get past Diffie-Hellman and look at Deleuze-Guattari, etc. 

People are stuck on a hierarchical model with a few trusted providers and that is resulting in competition to be one of those providers we see today. 

OpenID needs to be distributed, p2pID. Unlimited identities linked together in flexible ways.  I babbled about it last week. 

http://www.shadydentist.com/wordpress/archives/2007/03/26/changing-openids-metaphor-to-p2pid/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I believe OpenID&#8217;s flaw isn&#8217;t technological, it&#8217;s mental. We need to get get past Diffie-Hellman and look at Deleuze-Guattari, etc. </p>
<p>People are stuck on a hierarchical model with a few trusted providers and that is resulting in competition to be one of those providers we see today. </p>
<p>OpenID needs to be distributed, p2pID. Unlimited identities linked together in flexible ways.  I babbled about it last week. </p>
<p><a href="http://www.shadydentist.com/wordpress/archives/2007/03/26/changing-openids-metaphor-to-p2pid/" rel="nofollow">http://www.shadydentist.com/wordpress/archives/2007/03/26/changing-openids-metaphor-to-p2pid/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mxcl</title>
		<link>http://kveton.com/blog/2007/04/02/state-of-openid-april-2007-by-the-numbers/#comment-18676</link>
		<dc:creator>mxcl</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Apr 2007 10:37:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://kveton.com/blog/2007/04/02/state-of-openid-april-2007-by-the-numbers/#comment-18676</guid>
		<description>It would be great if we started getting more consumers and less servers. As I wonder if it may just get confusing if everyone can serve. Especially if nobody consumes!

Crossing fingers for the future.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It would be great if we started getting more consumers and less servers. As I wonder if it may just get confusing if everyone can serve. Especially if nobody consumes!</p>
<p>Crossing fingers for the future.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
