<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: OpenID: Single sign-on and so much more</title>
	<atom:link href="http://kveton.com/blog/2007/01/22/openid-single-sign-on-and-so-much-more/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://kveton.com/blog/2007/01/22/openid-single-sign-on-and-so-much-more/</link>
	<description>Father, entrepreneur, pizza maker &#38; bacon lover</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 22 Feb 2010 20:18:16 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Mark Scrimshire</title>
		<link>http://kveton.com/blog/2007/01/22/openid-single-sign-on-and-so-much-more/comment-page-1/#comment-122205</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark Scrimshire</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 May 2008 20:42:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://kveton.com/blog/2007/01/22/openid-single-sign-on-and-so-much-more/#comment-122205</guid>
		<description>I think there is a great opportunity to advance SSO for Enterprises using OpenID SSO between business partners.

I have started putting my thoughts together on my blog:
http://ekive.blogspot.com/2008/05/openid-and-single-sign-on-across-sites.html


and on the DataPortability.org General Group: http://groups.google.com/group/dataportability-public/browse_thread/thread/9bc9be257eb28c33

I need to check my thinking to make sure it makes sense.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think there is a great opportunity to advance SSO for Enterprises using OpenID SSO between business partners.</p>
<p>I have started putting my thoughts together on my blog:<br />
<a href="http://ekive.blogspot.com/2008/05/openid-and-single-sign-on-across-sites.html" rel="nofollow">http://ekive.blogspot.com/2008/05/openid-and-single-sign-on-across-sites.html</a></p>
<p>and on the DataPortability.org General Group: <a href="http://groups.google.com/group/dataportability-public/browse_thread/thread/9bc9be257eb28c33" rel="nofollow">http://groups.google.com/group/dataportability-public/browse_thread/thread/9bc9be257eb28c33</a></p>
<p>I need to check my thinking to make sure it makes sense.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://kveton.com/blog/2007/01/22/openid-single-sign-on-and-so-much-more/comment-page-1/#comment-122201</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 May 2008 20:36:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://kveton.com/blog/2007/01/22/openid-single-sign-on-and-so-much-more/#comment-122201</guid>
		<description>I have been thinking about OpenID and Single Sign On and posted thoughts at:

http://ekive.blogspot.com/2008/05/openid-and-single-sign-on-across-sites.html

and also on the Data portability group here:

http://groups.google.com/group/dataportability-public/browse_thread/thread/9bc9be257eb28c33

I think there is an opportunity to do open federated SSO that might be attractive to enterprises.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have been thinking about OpenID and Single Sign On and posted thoughts at:</p>
<p><a href="http://ekive.blogspot.com/2008/05/openid-and-single-sign-on-across-sites.html" rel="nofollow">http://ekive.blogspot.com/2008/05/openid-and-single-sign-on-across-sites.html</a></p>
<p>and also on the Data portability group here:</p>
<p><a href="http://groups.google.com/group/dataportability-public/browse_thread/thread/9bc9be257eb28c33" rel="nofollow">http://groups.google.com/group/dataportability-public/browse_thread/thread/9bc9be257eb28c33</a></p>
<p>I think there is an opportunity to do open federated SSO that might be attractive to enterprises.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kveton</title>
		<link>http://kveton.com/blog/2007/01/22/openid-single-sign-on-and-so-much-more/comment-page-1/#comment-6806</link>
		<dc:creator>kveton</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Jan 2007 14:13:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://kveton.com/blog/2007/01/22/openid-single-sign-on-and-so-much-more/#comment-6806</guid>
		<description>Hi Arioch:  OpenID has been bound by HTTP because of the requirement to interact with the browser.  There is much discussion going on on the mailing lists about allowing non-interactive logins with OpenID.  This would enable you to use command-line clients or do things &quot;as the user&quot; when they are not present (although you would need their permission).

Although http://user@server is a valid URL, is it one that my grandma or 8 year-old niece understands?  There is technically possible and then there is the reality of user understanding.

I&#039;m sorry that my blog won&#039;t allow you to post comments to it.  I&#039;ve had several other people login today with their OpenID&#039;s and leave comments.  You might want to try some of the diagnostic tools available:

http://www.openidenabled.com/openid/openid-tools

http://www.openidenabled.com/yadis/developer-tools/yadis-diagnostic

Hope that helps!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Arioch:  OpenID has been bound by HTTP because of the requirement to interact with the browser.  There is much discussion going on on the mailing lists about allowing non-interactive logins with OpenID.  This would enable you to use command-line clients or do things &#8220;as the user&#8221; when they are not present (although you would need their permission).</p>
<p>Although <a href="http://user@server" rel="nofollow">http://user@server</a> is a valid URL, is it one that my grandma or 8 year-old niece understands?  There is technically possible and then there is the reality of user understanding.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m sorry that my blog won&#8217;t allow you to post comments to it.  I&#8217;ve had several other people login today with their OpenID&#8217;s and leave comments.  You might want to try some of the diagnostic tools available:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.openidenabled.com/openid/openid-tools" rel="nofollow">http://www.openidenabled.com/openid/openid-tools</a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.openidenabled.com/yadis/developer-tools/yadis-diagnostic" rel="nofollow">http://www.openidenabled.com/yadis/developer-tools/yadis-diagnostic</a></p>
<p>Hope that helps!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Arioch</title>
		<link>http://kveton.com/blog/2007/01/22/openid-single-sign-on-and-so-much-more/comment-page-1/#comment-6803</link>
		<dc:creator>Arioch</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Jan 2007 11:37:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://kveton.com/blog/2007/01/22/openid-single-sign-on-and-so-much-more/#comment-6803</guid>
		<description>http://openid.net/wiki/index.php/WishList#Feature_requests.3F

See comments from annonymous.

Why OpenId is to be bound solely within http ?

And still http://user:password@server is a possible URL.
Just make http://user@server (with empty password) redirect to some profile page - though it need specific settings of www server.

BTW, my Website is an open-id, but this blog ignores it :-(</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://openid.net/wiki/index.php/WishList#Feature_requests.3F" rel="nofollow">http://openid.net/wiki/index.php/WishList#Feature_requests.3F</a></p>
<p>See comments from annonymous.</p>
<p>Why OpenId is to be bound solely within http ?</p>
<p>And still <a href="http://user:password@server" rel="nofollow">http://user:password@server</a> is a possible URL.<br />
Just make <a href="http://user@server" rel="nofollow">http://user@server</a> (with empty password) redirect to some profile page &#8211; though it need specific settings of www server.</p>
<p>BTW, my Website is an open-id, but this blog ignores it :-(</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kveton</title>
		<link>http://kveton.com/blog/2007/01/22/openid-single-sign-on-and-so-much-more/comment-page-1/#comment-6792</link>
		<dc:creator>kveton</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Jan 2007 01:52:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://kveton.com/blog/2007/01/22/openid-single-sign-on-and-so-much-more/#comment-6792</guid>
		<description>But its not a destination in the web sense.  How would you put your hCard or iCal information at that address?

dkearns@gmail.com is ambiguous as well.  Is it an email?  A jabber address?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>But its not a destination in the web sense.  How would you put your hCard or iCal information at that address?</p>
<p><a href="mailto:dkearns@gmail.com">dkearns@gmail.com</a> is ambiguous as well.  Is it an email?  A jabber address?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave Kearns</title>
		<link>http://kveton.com/blog/2007/01/22/openid-single-sign-on-and-so-much-more/comment-page-1/#comment-6791</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave Kearns</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Jan 2007 01:41:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://kveton.com/blog/2007/01/22/openid-single-sign-on-and-so-much-more/#comment-6791</guid>
		<description>Last I looked, Scott &quot;dkearns@gmail.com&quot; was both unique and addressable. And a lot older than OpenID...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Last I looked, Scott &#8220;dkearns@gmail.com&#8221; was both unique and addressable. And a lot older than OpenID&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
