Scott Kveton

There has been a bunch of discussion about OpenID 2.0 and how the latest draft does not address phishing at all.

First and foremost; phishing is an extremely important problem and one that is more than just OpenID-related. It just so happens that OpenID really exacerbates the problem because if you phish someones OpenID you could potentially have access to all of the sites they login to. I couldn’t agree more.

Alright, so let’s step back for a moment and ask ourselves; why hasn’t phishing been solved before this? Its been a huge problem for folks like PayPal and eBay. I think the main reason is that the problem is compartmentalized. Today, you might get one account (albeit a very important account) phished, but its just that one account you have to deal with. As such, no real definitive solutions have come up to completely (or mostly completely) solve the problem.

Enter OpenID 2.0. OpenID 2.0 is the culmination of lots of technology, ideas and people from many different schools of thought on identity. With pieces of Sxip, LID, XRI and others involved, we have a unique solution that is quickly gaining market and mind share. What’s really interesting is the firestorm that this has kicked up on the mailing list about phishing. Wow! This is fantastic! People are actually devoting some serious attention to and proposing some excellent solutions to phishing. If anything, the OpenID discussion might help move the phishing discussion (and thus OpenID) move forward.

We’ve got the proposal for Petnames/Passpet, SRP, the creation of an identity manager, the use of InfoCards with OpenID and a raft of others. This is great. The conversation is happening and solutions are being worked on. Wow. Talk about cool.

What’s most interesting to me is the nature of OpenID and why its succeeding. OpenID is the HTML to the world’s SGML identity solutions. Yes, SGML was infinitely superior to HTML but it was HTML that “won” out. Simple works and not only that simple wins. The barrier to adoption has to be low and the ability for the technology to proliferate from a bottoms-up standpoint is critical to for the success of a technology like OpenID.

I was going to write more on this but when I found Gabe Wachob’s post I just stopped and realized it couldn’t be said any better:

No, OpenID doesn’t solve all problems, and maybe today it only solves a very narrow set of problems with an acceptable risk profile. But to me, thats not the point – its the unleashing of creativity and the power to let developers and architects focus on what they are interested in and good at. Security and identity nuts can focus on authentication and let the social networking, wiki-touting, web 2.0-heads do what they do best! OpenID is an abstraction, a key middle ground for these folks to meet and leverage each other’s work – that OpenID is deployed for use in a fairly narrow set of use cases TODAY should not mean that it will not be very important in they very near future…

Gabe is dead on … OpenID makes the problem of phishing that much more important … the people on the general list and all of the great discussion in this space are leading to a solution. This is a solution that might not have been possible were it not for OpenID. If done correctly, the technologies and methods adopted for by OpenID providers could be a significant driver of the technology.