<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.3.2" -->
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: 2007: OpenID Predictions</title>
	<link>http://kveton.com/blog/2007/01/04/2007-openid-predictions/</link>
	<description>Husband, father, geek, pizza maker &#38; bacon lover</description>
	<pubDate>Sun, 23 Nov 2008 15:43:14 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.3.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: SVPN Cop</title>
		<link>http://kveton.com/blog/2007/01/04/2007-openid-predictions/#comment-48147</link>
		<dc:creator>SVPN Cop</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Sep 2007 08:19:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://kveton.com/blog/2007/01/04/2007-openid-predictions/#comment-48147</guid>
		<description>Not many quality OpenID sites yet it seems.  They need to convert some people fast.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Not many quality OpenID sites yet it seems.  They need to convert some people fast.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Microsoft to drop Passport for OpenID &#171; Adam On Life</title>
		<link>http://kveton.com/blog/2007/01/04/2007-openid-predictions/#comment-18009</link>
		<dc:creator>Microsoft to drop Passport for OpenID &#171; Adam On Life</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Apr 2007 18:21:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://kveton.com/blog/2007/01/04/2007-openid-predictions/#comment-18009</guid>
		<description>[...] 1 Apr, 2007&#160; Identity   Earlier this year, Microsoft announced official support for OpenID which was well embraced by quite a few people. Although Microsoft has always been one to lead the way, they&#8217;ve decided to help out one step more. As of today, all Microsoft Passport accounts also work as OpenID via Microsofts new &#8220;Live&#8221; initiative. This follows AOL which recently granted all AOL users an OpenID as well, boosting the number of potential users by 63 million. With Microsoft&#8217;s addition of hundreds of millions to the OpenID world, this breaks the predictions by Scott Kveton, the CEO of JanRain that OpenID support would exceed 100 million users in 2007! Who&#8217;s next now? Google? Yahoo? Time to step up! [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] 1 Apr, 2007&nbsp; Identity   Earlier this year, Microsoft announced official support for OpenID which was well embraced by quite a few people. Although Microsoft has always been one to lead the way, they&#8217;ve decided to help out one step more. As of today, all Microsoft Passport accounts also work as OpenID via Microsofts new &#8220;Live&#8221; initiative. This follows AOL which recently granted all AOL users an OpenID as well, boosting the number of potential users by 63 million. With Microsoft&#8217;s addition of hundreds of millions to the OpenID world, this breaks the predictions by Scott Kveton, the CEO of JanRain that OpenID support would exceed 100 million users in 2007! Who&#8217;s next now? Google? Yahoo? Time to step up! [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Security Roundtable &#187; Blog Archive &#187; The Security Roundtable for February 2007 - OpenID</title>
		<link>http://kveton.com/blog/2007/01/04/2007-openid-predictions/#comment-14901</link>
		<dc:creator>The Security Roundtable &#187; Blog Archive &#187; The Security Roundtable for February 2007 - OpenID</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Mar 2007 19:56:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://kveton.com/blog/2007/01/04/2007-openid-predictions/#comment-14901</guid>
		<description>[...] Steve Kveton&#8217;s predictions - http://kveton.com/blog/2007/01/04/2007-openid-predictions/ [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] Steve Kveton&#8217;s predictions - <a href="http://kveton.com/blog/2007/01/04/2007-openid-predictions/" rel="nofollow">http://kveton.com/blog/2007/01/04/2007-openid-predictions/</a> [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Yahoo ID和OpenID帐号整合 &#124; OpenID Planet</title>
		<link>http://kveton.com/blog/2007/01/04/2007-openid-predictions/#comment-9747</link>
		<dc:creator>Yahoo ID和OpenID帐号整合 &#124; OpenID Planet</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Feb 2007 05:12:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://kveton.com/blog/2007/01/04/2007-openid-predictions/#comment-9747</guid>
		<description>[...] 2007: OpenID Predictions关于OpenID２00７年的预测，OpenID也跨入2.0了，并且将实现1亿用户和7500个支援OpenID的网站以及其他更多方面的。OpenID的发展是越发的迅速了，Google趋势上关于OpenID的评估也一直在上升。也许2007年真的是OpenID年 [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] 2007: OpenID Predictions关于OpenID２00７年的预测，OpenID也跨入2.0了，并且将实现1亿用户和7500个支援OpenID的网站以及其他更多方面的。OpenID的发展是越发的迅速了，Google趋势上关于OpenID的评估也一直在上升。也许2007年真的是OpenID年 [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Yahoo ID和OpenID帐号整合 at OpenID Planet</title>
		<link>http://kveton.com/blog/2007/01/04/2007-openid-predictions/#comment-9512</link>
		<dc:creator>Yahoo ID和OpenID帐号整合 at OpenID Planet</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 Feb 2007 04:44:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://kveton.com/blog/2007/01/04/2007-openid-predictions/#comment-9512</guid>
		<description>[...] 2007: OpenID Predictions关于OpenID２00７年的预测，OpenID也跨入2.0了，并且将实现1亿用户和7500个支援OpenID的网站以及其他更多方面的。OpenID的发展是越发的迅速了，Google趋势上关于OpenID的评估也一直在上升。也许2007年真的是OpenID年 [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] 2007: OpenID Predictions关于OpenID２00７年的预测，OpenID也跨入2.0了，并且将实现1亿用户和7500个支援OpenID的网站以及其他更多方面的。OpenID的发展是越发的迅速了，Google趋势上关于OpenID的评估也一直在上升。也许2007年真的是OpenID年 [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: http://katzenjammer.myopenid.com/</title>
		<link>http://kveton.com/blog/2007/01/04/2007-openid-predictions/#comment-6043</link>
		<dc:creator>http://katzenjammer.myopenid.com/</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Jan 2007 17:05:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://kveton.com/blog/2007/01/04/2007-openid-predictions/#comment-6043</guid>
		<description>Just testing openid. Thanks</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just testing openid. Thanks</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: flavien</title>
		<link>http://kveton.com/blog/2007/01/04/2007-openid-predictions/#comment-6007</link>
		<dc:creator>flavien</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Jan 2007 16:36:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://kveton.com/blog/2007/01/04/2007-openid-predictions/#comment-6007</guid>
		<description>test comment with openid</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>test comment with openid</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: //dopefreshtightblog</title>
		<link>http://kveton.com/blog/2007/01/04/2007-openid-predictions/#comment-5786</link>
		<dc:creator>//dopefreshtightblog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 07 Jan 2007 14:10:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://kveton.com/blog/2007/01/04/2007-openid-predictions/#comment-5786</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;OpenID in 2007...&lt;/strong&gt;

URL-basierte Identitätsdienste wie OpenID lösen einen guten Tei der Authentifizierungsprobleme im Web2.0: Multi Sign-on und das Aktualisieren der Identitätsdaten bei zig verschiedenen Diensten könnten schon bald der Vergangenheit angehören, denn O...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>OpenID in 2007&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>URL-basierte Identitätsdienste wie OpenID lösen einen guten Tei der Authentifizierungsprobleme im Web2.0: Multi Sign-on und das Aktualisieren der Identitätsdaten bei zig verschiedenen Diensten könnten schon bald der Vergangenheit angehören, denn O&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kevindewalt</title>
		<link>http://kveton.com/blog/2007/01/04/2007-openid-predictions/#comment-5630</link>
		<dc:creator>kevindewalt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Jan 2007 15:55:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://kveton.com/blog/2007/01/04/2007-openid-predictions/#comment-5630</guid>
		<description>Scott,

Awesome post as always.  I have only been following OpenId recently but am very excited about the possibilities.

One of the beauties of the current standard is that it is simple to explain and understand.

Do you have any references that explain the 2.0 standard in layman's terms?  What will be the changes and benefits.

Thanks again,

Kevin Dewalt</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Scott,</p>
<p>Awesome post as always.  I have only been following OpenId recently but am very excited about the possibilities.</p>
<p>One of the beauties of the current standard is that it is simple to explain and understand.</p>
<p>Do you have any references that explain the 2.0 standard in layman&#8217;s terms?  What will be the changes and benefits.</p>
<p>Thanks again,</p>
<p>Kevin Dewalt</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dmitry Shechtman</title>
		<link>http://kveton.com/blog/2007/01/04/2007-openid-predictions/#comment-5259</link>
		<dc:creator>Dmitry Shechtman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Jan 2007 18:54:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://kveton.com/blog/2007/01/04/2007-openid-predictions/#comment-5259</guid>
		<description>@Scott

From your lips to God's ear!

Looks like you enabled MyBlogLog in in spite of its failure to support OpenID. Maybe they need to be reminded of it once in a while ;-)

@Kick

I totally agree with you on the importance of trust for the acceptance of OpenID. That would also address the spam issue, as well as put an end to attempts at centralization (e.g. BotBouncer).

I suggested a simple addition to the specification that would allow to accomplish this (openid.authority), although I never made a formal proposal of it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Scott</p>
<p>From your lips to God&#8217;s ear!</p>
<p>Looks like you enabled MyBlogLog in in spite of its failure to support OpenID. Maybe they need to be reminded of it once in a while ;-)</p>
<p>@Kick</p>
<p>I totally agree with you on the importance of trust for the acceptance of OpenID. That would also address the spam issue, as well as put an end to attempts at centralization (e.g. BotBouncer).</p>
<p>I suggested a simple addition to the specification that would allow to accomplish this (openid.authority), although I never made a formal proposal of it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
