<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.3.2" -->
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: OpenID + VoIP == Good?</title>
	<link>http://kveton.com/blog/2006/12/14/openid-voip-good/</link>
	<description>Husband, father, geek, pizza maker &#38; bacon lover</description>
	<pubDate>Sun, 23 Nov 2008 16:26:18 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.3.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: VoIP Man</title>
		<link>http://kveton.com/blog/2006/12/14/openid-voip-good/#comment-20761</link>
		<dc:creator>VoIP Man</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Apr 2007 09:17:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://kveton.com/blog/2006/12/14/openid-voip-good/#comment-20761</guid>
		<description>Yay, I am all for openness, including Open ID :-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yay, I am all for openness, including Open ID :-)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Telepocalypse</title>
		<link>http://kveton.com/blog/2006/12/14/openid-voip-good/#comment-3939</link>
		<dc:creator>Telepocalypse</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Dec 2006 20:28:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://kveton.com/blog/2006/12/14/openid-voip-good/#comment-3939</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Shut up, Martin!...&lt;/strong&gt;

There seems to be considerable public demand, so I&#8217;ll explain why no amount of technology is going to make an open voice network appear. I&#8217;ve written about open vs. closed networks before a bit. We don&#8217;t have a comprehensive theory......</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Shut up, Martin!&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>There seems to be considerable public demand, so I&#8217;ll explain why no amount of technology is going to make an open voice network appear. I&#8217;ve written about open vs. closed networks before a bit. We don&#8217;t have a comprehensive theory&#8230;&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
