Comments on: Yahoo! Browser-Based Authentication http://kveton.com/blog/2006/09/30/yahoo-browser-based-authentication/ Father, entrepreneur, pizza maker & bacon lover Mon, 22 Feb 2010 20:18:16 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2 hourly 1 By: http://kronkltd.net/ http://kveton.com/blog/2006/09/30/yahoo-browser-based-authentication/comment-page-1/#comment-1667 http://kronkltd.net/ Fri, 13 Oct 2006 00:44:14 +0000 http://kveton.com/blog/2006/09/30/yahoo-browser-based-authentication/#comment-1667 When I first learned about OpenID, my first thought was that it\'d be great for Yahoo. Yahoo already has a very large user base and gives a profile page to every user. (Although it changes if you sign up for 360.) Hopefully, once 2.0 is finished and proven, and some of the other specs that go on top of it (OpenID-AX) are ready to go, we\'ll start to see more big names taking a look into it. When I first learned about OpenID, my first thought was that it\’d be great for Yahoo. Yahoo already has a very large user base and gives a profile page to every user. (Although it changes if you sign up for 360.)

Hopefully, once 2.0 is finished and proven, and some of the other specs that go on top of it (OpenID-AX) are ready to go, we\’ll start to see more big names taking a look into it.

]]> By: kveton http://kveton.com/blog/2006/09/30/yahoo-browser-based-authentication/comment-page-1/#comment-913 kveton Sun, 01 Oct 2006 16:47:12 +0000 http://kveton.com/blog/2006/09/30/yahoo-browser-based-authentication/#comment-913 Point well taken. Fixed! This is what I get for blogging on little or no sleep! :-) Point well taken. Fixed! This is what I get for blogging on little or no sleep! :-)

]]> By: pd http://kveton.com/blog/2006/09/30/yahoo-browser-based-authentication/comment-page-1/#comment-905 pd Sun, 01 Oct 2006 10:24:11 +0000 http://kveton.com/blog/2006/09/30/yahoo-browser-based-authentication/#comment-905 There's a substantial grammatical error in the first sentence of this post. What exactly is the point you were trying to communicate? There’s a substantial grammatical error in the first sentence of this post. What exactly is the point you were trying to communicate?

]]>